The minute that this concept came up in lecture, and then when it came up in our section's discussion, my mind immediately went to the show The Big Bang Theory.
I am a HUGE fan of the show and I watch it religiously, but I got to thinking how this show (and most television shows for that matter) perpetuate this notion that our identity lies with our job. The cast of main characters on the show are Sheldon, Leonard, Howard, and Raj, whom all work at Cal Tech in Pasadena, California. Sheldon and Leonard are theoretical physicists, Howard is an aerospace engineer, and Roj is an astrophysicist. Penny, a waitress at The Cheesecake Factory and a hopeful actress, is also a major character on the show.
![]() |
| From left to right: Raj, Leonard, Penny, Sheldon, and Howard from CBS' The Big Bang Theory |
One article from NYDailyNews.com analyzes the show's popularity, attributing much of it to the quirky characters, the show's intelligent banter, the constant references to current technology, and the idea that the characters, who appear as outsiders, allow many to identity with the show. There it is- this concept of identity. And how, might you ask does Marx and his ideas come into this? Well, I prompt the question: would the show be what it is if the dialogue, the characters, the stories, the settings weren't built around what the characters do for a living?
Many a joke have been said that were reliant on the fact that Penny is a 'mere' waitress and unable to understand the complex physics jargon that the other characters casually toss around. There is constant humor found in Sheldon's lack of any social knowledge given the fact that he was in college and studying physics by the time he was 12. The list goes on and on. Further, in the show's pilot, when Leonard and Sheldon meet Penny for the first time, it comes up in the first lines of dialogue that Penny is a waitress and that Leonard and Sheldon work at the University. Each of these characters are identified in their society and even in their social groups by what job they do and where they do it. This all ties directly into Marx and what he is trying to combat, the idea that we are what we do.
Take, for example, this video that we saw in lecture, with Charlie Chaplin in Modern Times.
We used the Charlie Chaplin example in class to highlight Marx's concerns. Chaplin, while working on the assembly line literally just becomes part of the machine- he is completely defined not by his personality or even by his humanity. He is valuable simply because of what he does in the factory. Now in the Big Bang Theory clip, none of the characters are on the assembly line or becoming part of some sort of machinery, but they all represent the idea that they are what they do. Sheldon, obviously, is showing this most expertly. The comedy is built upon the characters dependence on what they do to support their identity. They are all scientists, thus Sheldon finds the jokes about physics funny. They like video games and Star Wars and comic books and technology: none of the characters waver on this. They all identify with each other and with society by what they do.
![]() |
| This image represents our tendency to identify ourselves in society by where we work or what we do for work. |
If we think about it and we can see such a phenomenon perpetuated in pop culture, we can't help but see it in our daily interactions. When we first meet somebody, what do we ask? Name, maybe age, maybe hometown, but their profession most definitely comes up. Even we, living the college life, do it. When we meet somebody new we go through the routine: my name is, my year at school is, I live here, and my major is this. We all do this unconsciously. Our job, our major, or the lack of a job or major defines who we are in society. In the most extreme cases, we are the characters in The Big Bang Theory: we find ourselves by finding a career.Is this a problem? Was Marx right to try to combat this phenomenon? What do we identify with if not our job? How do we make a change? Why do we all love shows like The Big Bang Theory? Something points to the fact that capitalism, as Marx pointed out, has evolved into a force that has come to drive even individual ideas, because in our modern world, it seems as though we all really have become exactly what we do for a living.



I really enjoyed the post and I am a huge Big Bang Theory fan myself. I found it interesting that you made a connection between people being defined by their job and the Big Bang Theory. I thought that both videos right next to each other showed great comparisons.
ReplyDeleteOne question I do have though is whether our identity is based on our job, or our job is based from our identity. After all, Sheldon and Leonard may be super intelligent nerds that like video games. However, did they become this way only after they started a career in physics. They were most likely this way long before they started their work at Cal Tech. It seems to me that it was their identity that caused them to connect with the field of physics. Therefore, their job matched their identity now because their identity helped decide their job.
Also, one of the reasons that we enjoy characters from a show like this is because they show stereotypes in different ways. While these nerdy guys have a supposedly "nerdy" field of study, not everyone in real life is this way. In real life, a person's identity may not match the characteristics and stereotypes of their career.
Jake, I agree with your idea that we are not based off our jobs but rather we chose our jobs based on who we are. This topic is prevalent to us college students because we are in the years where we choose our careers. When we have to choose a major that reflect us, a "chicken and egg" argument occurs, and furthermore a question of why we are choosing that major? This question can be answered by Menand's Theories of Higher Education. Going off Theory 1, the content major wouldn't matter but the ranking and profitability of that major would. Even if a student hated science, he might become pre-med to be sorted into a higher earning class at graduation. In his future years, his identity would be based of his job not job based off his identity. If we follow theory 2, then the student would choose his major based on his interests. The student would be an English major and down the road his job would be based off his identity. From what I know of the Big Bang Theory, Sheldon and Leonard probably followed Theory 2 while in school, proving that their jobs are based from their identity.
ReplyDelete