Friday, December 7, 2012

Strut your Stuff




In my last section for my communication studies class we discussed the differences between males and females, focusing on their body language and mannerisms. This directly reminded me of the essay, “Throwing like a Girl” by Iris Young. When reading this piece I was struck by how much it rang true for me, and I realized Young’s essay exemplifies the exact issues that magazines like Cosmopolitan and Seventeen promote. Young discusses how women tend to be self-conscious and cautious of their bodies, which affects their mobility in their daily lives. In Young’s words, her essay illustrates a "phenomenological" examination of how we live in our bodies.

In my communication studies course we’ve investigated the progression of feminism throughout the 1990s and then 2000s. Currently we’re in the middle of “post feminism” or what my professor likes to refer to as “enlightened sexism.” It is the notion that since men and women are in fact equal, there is no more need for feminism. Feminism is in essence over with and ‘not cool’. Therefore, women should not protest and criticize the media when they see covers of Maxim with half naked girls on the cover. These magazines also portray women to be objects rather than subjects. They are constantly in the wraps of a man and look directly at the reader as if they are simply dying for their attention and gaze. Their bodies are restrained in positions that show off their breasts or other features. It looks unnatural, but also looks very feminine and seductive at the same time. Young argues:

“We often experience our bodies as fragile encumbrance, rather than the media for the enactment of our aims. We feel as though we must have our attention directed upon our bodies to make sure they are doing what we wish them to do, rather than paying attention to what we want to do thorugh our bodies” (146-7).

Of course there are exceptions to her claim, but these words directly describe the models and actresses we see in the media, which transcends to female teenagers and adults today because we aspire to be like the women that are portrayed in magazines and on television. In a sense, magazines targeted for females take what Young describes to be a self-imposed “I cannot” and make it work; if women simply “cannot” do the same things as men than why not be as appealing to men as we possibly can and have them do it for us? All these magazines are chock-full of articles on “How to leave him wanting more” or “How to win him over.” It’s no wonder women have this attitude “I cannot” if all we are supposed to think about is how to rely on men and being overly obsessive about having a guy. 
From the November 2012 Maxim issue
In my discussion two boys were asked to act like girls and two girls were asked to pretend to be boys. The two boys were surprisingly extremely accurate. They took smaller strides than normal and held their arms in close to their waist. They looked slightly uncomfortable and more fragile. It was actually creepy to watch these two boys portray what was supposed to be me when I’m walking down the street. It was like looking in a mirror and never realizing how restrained and uptight I look. On the other hand, the two girls took longer strides and looked more relaxed. Their arms hung loose and their shoulders were not up by their ears. They looked uninhibited and not self-conscious in the slightest. Young would relate this movement to “immanence” and “transcendence.” For Young, the way women move, and the way they throw a ball, can be related to “tension” and being “a mere object.”

To the extent that a woman lives her body as a thing, she remains rooted in immanence, is inhibited and retains a distance from her body as transcending movement and from engagement in the world’s possibilities” (150). 

              What better example than "The Plastics" from Mean Girls.
This part of the essay I don’t necessarily agree with. Today I don’t think women are “rooted in immanence” in the same way they were before or even during the first feminist movement. On the other hand, the media perpetuates restraint of female mobility and self-consciousness for ones body through images and stereotypes of what it means to be feminine. 

3 comments:

  1. Olivia, Great parallel between Young and Douglas' ideas on Enlightened Feminism. I agree with you when you disagreed with Young when she said that women are "rooted in immanence," especially when describing their physicality. Just like men, there are some women who are more outgoing physically and some who are more restrained, but I don't think this is an attribute based off of gender. You embedded the Mean Girl's clip which I think you could have explained more, but I think it's a good addition. "The Plastics" are girls who are not "rooted in immanence" The video clips shows them strutting through the hallways and being outward with their body appearance. I disagree with Young when she says women do not, "engagement in the world’s possibilities." Watching the women today or the girls in Mean Girls, we can see that girls do engage in the world's possibilities.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post relating communications and political science together. I do not believe that we are in a total post-feminism society though. The society that we are in still pays men more and gives them a higher status. Although you point to each gender's confidence level, I think that is one aspect of society that is close to being equal. With the "Mean Girls" clip you show that women have the capability to have equal and even more confidence than men. How the media views men and women is very interesting. With the emergence of new technologies, I wonder how much more of an effect will media have on today's society and culture.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Olivia. I thought your example of your communications class really helped me understand phenomenology. The concept is tricky to put into words but the class example when the boys had to act like girls walking and vice versa was very true and something we rarely think about. I agree with most of your argument but I find that the Mean Girls clip is actually an example of how women are still "rooted in imminence" like Young says. Because of the way the four girls present themselves it suggests they have a different personality from the one they actually have (this can be seen in the rumors made up by the students). This clip just shows that they way women present their bodies shapes how people understand them, whether they are flaunt their bodies or are more restrained. Just because the girls are able to "strut their stuff" does not mean they will be treated equally.

    ReplyDelete