![]() |
| The UK version of AskJeeves |
In the interview with Slavoj Zizek, roles of power are
discussed. Reading Zizek’s comments on the Revolutionary Communist Party, the
proletariat, servants and slaves, sparked an interest in characters of lower
class people have played in media. The lower class is
underrepresented today in TV and movies and it is rare a poorer person is the
hero in any mass-produced plot. In Marxist theory, he believes the bourgeoisie,
the upper class of society, having an upper hand over the proletariat, the
working class. The limitations the proletariat faced upheld through out
history, and can be seen today. Let’s take a closer look of the icons of the proletariat
to examine how our popular culture has defined them.
![]() |
| Steven Fry as Jeeves on the Left |
When I
think of someone serving someone else my mind goes to a Butler, and to my
chagrin the first butler I think of is Jeeves, from the old AskJeeves.com. Now AskJeeves.com is now just Ask.com but the UK version still has the character Jeeves on it's website. Looking further into the Jeeves character, he was a butler as the search engine
was supposed to retrieve answers for the user like a butler would retrieve
anything. Jeeves was based off of a largely known fictional British butler,
Reginald Jeeves. He was the butler or valet to Bertie Wooster in the novels of
P.G. Wodehouse. Since him, Jeeves has become the quintessential name for a
valet or butler and now Jeeves is in the Oxford
English Dictionary. Another famous butler is Alonzo Fields, a White House
Butler for 21 years. Fields wrote a book after he retired, My 21 Years in
the White House, which explained his experiences of working for four
different presidents and their families. Fields must have known he was
experiencing a large part of history, and came out on the other side with a
books full of knowledge of the workings of the white house. Fields is obviously
a bright man, but ended up spending his life serving others. Can we take his
word when we read, “Alonzo found White House employment suited him?” Rousseau
raises some of the same issues, and asks us how the strong come to obey the
weak? Whether stronger or of the same caliber, how does one man assert power over another? Marx would respond that men were born into the
roles, either of laborer or capitalists, starting off the race of life in
different starting blocks.
![]() |
| Alonzo Field |
Thinking of
other men in waiting, Bill “Bojangles” Robinson was a skilled American dancer
and actor whose most frequent role was Shirley Temple’s butler. Robinson
excelled in the vaudeville era, and his public role became a smiling, dancing,
dapper man watched by both blacks and whites. Most of his films were intended
for white audiences causing black and white audiences to have different
opinions of him. The whites nicknamed him "Bojangles," while black artists Tom Flatcher said it was slang for "squabbler." He was the first African-American male to be shown on film
dancing with a Caucasian girl, Shirley Temple, in 1935. His role in the Shirley
Temple moves was to wait on her and cater to anything she needed while smiling
and dancing along. Robinson’s role, like Jeeves, is to serve; a career most
modern day American’s can’t image spending their whole lives doing. Here is a video of Robinson dancing with Shirley Temple in one of their movies. You can see he is put on the same level as a young girl, showing some racial discrimination, while at the same time seeming as happy as one can be.
Looking at these Proletariat examples
we can consider, were these men forced into these degrading positions? Are they
degrading? Looking into Fields’ actions of writing his book after retiring from The White House, did
he hold power now over the American “Bourgeoisie.” Would Zizek see these men as powerful when characterized into a Proletariat rebellion or could they be perverts, with just the answers and no questions asked.



I found this article very interesting as it shows the very highest end of the proletariat class. I believe that a job of a butler is still characterized as a servant to the bourgeoisie class. Even though some of this men experienced fame after there work, they were still always a servant to the upper class. Even though these men have made it to the very top of their field, they are not able to overcome their status as a servant. Some of the actions of butlers such as the dancing butler still seemed like they were more of a second class citizen that some one like Shirley Temple became attached to.
ReplyDeleteTake for example a butler such as Alfred in Batman. In one of the later movies, Alfred will have a heroic moment. However, these moments do not seem like a hero accomplishing something. It seems more like a child doing some menial task that no one expected. Even heroic tasks are not rewarded.
In my opinion these butlers are still a part of the proletariat class. They just so happen to be working for a very high member of the bourgeoisie. I think that Zizek would still see them us lacking power with their only purpose being advice and service.
Although I do believe butlers to be a part of the Proletariat class, I don't believe they're role as butlers to be degrading. Although making assumptions based on television may not be too accurate, the video of Robinson dancing with Shirley reminded me of two shows I used to love as a child that had great portrayals of butlers, and not degrading in any form or fashion. First off, The Nanny. Niles, the butler for the Sheffield family, always said the wittiest things and I still remember laying in bed with my mother watching episodes and just laughing together for hours. Secondly, The Fresh Prince of Bellaire, and Geoffrey Butler. Just as Niles, he provided a large chunk of the entertainment and comedy on the show. These strong, charismatic portrayals of butlers says a lot in my opinion. Even though the social media is known for unfairly characterizing certain races or professions, I can't think of a show where the butler has been shown in a bad light. In these three examples, Shirley Temple, The Nanny, and The Fresh Prince of Bellaire, the butlers did not seem to have been forced into these degrading positions, and they even seemed to thoroughly enjoy their jobs.
ReplyDeleteThe butler is a very interesting position. When I think of a butler, I think of Alfred from Batman(like Jake above). Alfred does have his heroic moments as he saves Batman's life many times. He fulfills the role of doctor/nurse and experience teacher, all of which get Batman out of some dangerous situations. And I agree, Alfred and Batman by no means demonstrate the power struggle that Marx suggest. The Proletariat and the Bourgeois roles seem to not exist between butler and master. I think this is because butlers are seen as part of the family. Alfred for example is a sort of uncle or grandpa to Batman. These ties create it so that the butler and master respect each other.
ReplyDeleteI believe one could find a counter example to my theory of when a butler hates his master, but to describe the trend you state in your post, I think it is because the butler and masters share a friendship.