![]() |
| Plato is puzzled as well |
Imagine
everything you have ever known is a falsehood constructed to prevent you from
reaching the truth; everything in your life that you currently accept as truth is
in actuality a lie. In Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, this
is exactly what is going on. The cave dwellers remain chained to posts and
accept the shadows they see on the wall in front of them as reality, for it is
all they have ever known. This reality for them – or lack thereof – appears
horrible and misguided to those looking in from the outside, but for the cave
dwellers there is nothing else that exists for them to set as a standard. They
do not know that the status of their situation, so they live their lives in
ignorance of the world around them. It is with this in mind that we, the
“enlightened” readers know - or think we know - what actually occurs in life
and are able to call the shadows for what they really are: shadows. However,
all of this is based off of what we think we know as well, presenting an
interesting logical question: can true enlightenment ever be reached?
![]() |
| Truman in the process of self-awareness |
Much like the Allegory of the Cave, Jim Carrey stars
in a movie, The Truman Show, in which
Truman acts out his daily life, unaware that it is the subject of a TV show.
His every action is monitored by thousands of cameras, and all of the people involved
in his life are actors that are in on the secret. Everyone in the show is aware
that it is a show, except for Truman himself. In this, Truman (played by Jim
Carrey) plays a role akin to one the cave dwellers, unaware that the life he is
living is a false one. However, as the movie progresses Truman slowly becomes
more aware of the pretenses that have been put in place in order to keep him
oblivious. As he slowly becomes more enlightened, he sees the world in a
totally new light and is much more able to spot the tools that have been put in
place to keep the TV show running and on the air. With the ending scene, he is
finally able to break free of the massive television set and journey out into
the real world. Similar to the cave dweller leaving the cave for the first
time, Truman is in for a shock for the world outside the set.
All of this is
very unsettling for multiple reasons, mainly being that there is generally no
way to know if such a situation could exist in any of our own lives today. Are
we the subject of some TV show? Is everyone in the world besides you in on some
huge secret? There really is no true way to know, and that is what is the most
frightening. Moreover, would we want to leave behind the comfortable lives we currently live, if proven falsehoods, for some uncharted territory? Either way, no matter how far we travel down the path of enlightenment in
every day life; we could still be trapped in some allegorical cave to which
there is no end in sight rendering such enlightenment useless.
With this in mind,
is true enlightenment ever an actual possibility? Immanuel Kant, in his An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?, asserts that “enlightenment
is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity.” However, what if this
so-called “immaturity” is not just self-imposed, but rather also put in place
by some outside party. In this case, even if man were able to become
enlightened, it would all be for naught for he is living an illusion. This
dilemma, while extremely concerning, can never truly be solved, for there is no
way of knowing for sure whether or not this metaphorical cave actually exists.
Just as with the
cases of Truman and the cave dwellers, there is no way to escape the illusion
unless a way out presents itself. In the case of Truman, the way out presented
itself through a series of mistakes on the part of the film crew that led to
his self-awareness. For the cave dwellers, the way out only came about through
a forceful removal from the chains of bondage. With the case of humanity, for
all we know, all of us could be living in some Matrix type world, where humanity in its
entirety is trapped in an illusion. Or, with an idea even more concerning, the
governmental institutions that are currently in place could be creating an
illusion through the media, in order to retain control and power. Either way, the
scary truth with the possibility of such a metaphorical cave, is that true
enlightenment can never actually be reached within such a cave. Then again, if
true enlightenment were to be reached within such a fabrication, would it not
still be true enlightenment? Food for thought, and another possible blog post.


That's a great skeptical argument! I totally agree with your claim that there is no way to escape the illusion unless a way out presents itself. But for some philosopher, especially for Plato, the perceptible world is presenting its weakness. In the Republic, he argues that the real things are those that are always "is" and never "is not", while our perception only gives us stuff that in someway is and in other way is not (e.g, your index finger is short compared to your middle finger, but it's long compared to your little finger, so your index finger is in someway long and in other way not long) so the perceptible world is not real. (On the contrary, the form of Longness is always long and never not long, so the forms are the most real thing.)
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, for Kant, perceptible world has to be "real" because we are transcendentally imposed with ability of perceiving space and time and there is no way to get those "chain" off. So I think you are more likely to be on the same boat with him.
Among these two philosophers, I haven't got a rational view to evaluate which one is true, but I am more empathy with Plato, maybe because his more positive view about getting out of the cave, otherwise I cannot see the value of human life.
Xiaoqi, I like that you compare Kant to Plato and ask which was brings up a more desirable life. Life according to Kant would be one of discovery aimed toward enlightenment, which I feel like is a purpose of human life. Yes, we as humans all ready have the ability to perceive space and time, but isn't that how we want to live, in our control of whats happening. I wouldn't want to live in Plato's world, even if there is this positive hope of getting out of the cave. I would rather not live with a hope looming over my head. Maybe its the realist in me, but even if the truth is negative I would rather live in Kant's truth. But going back to Chap's post, if we thought we lived in Kant's world, there is still a possibility that we are in Plato's cave. There is really no way of knowing, we could be Truman thinking were reaching towards Enlightenment.
ReplyDelete